Source-traceable stress-testing for research-backed claims: what the source actually establishes, where implementation or interpretation adds load, and which conclusions remain defensible after inspection.
The service is not limited to one statistical technique or one kind of paper. The common unit is a material claim and its evidence trail.
Trace a proposition through the paper, table, figure, equation, measure, supplementary material, code, and earlier versions where relevant.
Test whether an observed measure, coefficient, proxy, or level of association is being treated as a stronger construct than the design identifies.
Inspect the actual machinery behind a robustness claim instead of treating the existence of code or supplementary analysis as validation.
Decompose summary indicators, denominators, shared ratio components, and individual-versus-group inference before accepting the headline interpretation.
Track how wording, evidence, caveats, and claim status change from working paper to revision, publication, self-citation, and downstream summary.
After the substantive position is fixed, align the written product with evidence strength without manufacturing missing theories, evidence, or expert opinion.
The archived R Markdown recalculates later multi-item reliabilities into one object while continuing to append values from a stale object. A bug-only repair changes the focal open-mindedness versus collective-narcissism ordering for the conspiracy-beliefs outcome. The repaired difference still has a 95% interval that narrowly includes zero, so the audit does not claim the opposite substantive theory is established.
Potential users include researchers, independent experts, boutique research or litigation-support teams, and organisations that want adversarial pre-release review of a consequential claim.
Quantitative verification is offered where a claim can be independently reconstructed from disclosed data, code, or reported quantities. This work is not a substitute for specialist statistical, legal, or subject-matter expert opinion.